Komen daripada pembaca blog malaysiatoday.net .
I watched the debate last night. Salahudin was outstanding and he carried himself well for PAS. I was expecting someone from PAS to be wearing a turban with a janggut. But looking at him debating last night, he could easily be passed off as a mild mannered, articulate and knowledgeable gentleman with western attire.
I watched the debate last night. Salahudin was outstanding and he carried himself well for PAS. I was expecting someone from PAS to be wearing a turban with a janggut. But looking at him debating last night, he could easily be passed off as a mild mannered, articulate and knowledgeable gentleman with western attire.
He asked Shahrir all the pertinent points but it was Shahrir who was putar-belit. He did not answer the pertinent points raised on the secret Petronas accounts, using of the windfall oil revenue and involvement of all parties including NGOs to deliberate the oil issues for the mid and long term. Instead, he side-step these issues and touched the accounts being audited and therefore credible (in the first place nobody question on whether Petronas's accounts are credible; only that it was not revealed)and the oil subsidy has been used for the citizens (nobody denied it was used for the citizens; issue was why Govt cannot maintain subsidy because of the windfall revenue earned by Petronas).
He also delivered a sarcastic lecture of what is revenue and profit (putar belit again) as if Salahuddin don't know the difference and anyway that was not the gist of what Salahuddin wanted to highlight. The other 2 gentlemen were a total disappointment. Instead of questioning Shahrir, they were questioning Salahuddin instead and asking leading questions (like Anwar's promise to reduce petrol price) so that Shahrir can have an opportunity to criticise the oppositions. Anyway, Salahuddin shot back by saying the 2 previous ex-finance ministers(Mahathir and Anwar)had a common opinion that the raising of oil prices is wrong. The political analyst there was even worst - instead of asking Shahrir, he asked Salahuddin why he did not provide the solution. Without any accounts of Petronas and involvement of the oppositions in the decision to raise the oil price, how could he offered the solution? Stupid fella, this BN lap-dog!
I more I watched Shahrir debate, I more I liken him to a snake - twisting, turning and avoiding pertinent issues. He doesn't come across convincing the viewers last night why the citizens should be treated as outsiders and having to pay market prices for petrol when Petronas is enjoying all these windfall revenue!
Rabu 11 Jun 2008 6 Jamadil Akhir 1429 Hijrah
Pengirim SMS 'debat harga minyak RTM1' maki kerajaan
Wan Nordin Wan Yaacob Wed Jun 11, 08 9:24:02 am MYT
Rabu 11 Jun 2008 6 Jamadil Akhir 1429 Hijrah
Pengirim SMS 'debat harga minyak RTM1' maki kerajaan
Wan Nordin Wan Yaacob Wed Jun 11, 08 9:24:02 am MYT
KUALA LUMPUR, 11 Jun (Hrkh) - Rata-rata pengirim sistem pesanan ringkas (SMS) dalam rancangan debat 'Penstrukturan Subsidi Minyak' di RTM1 malam tadi mengirin SMS memaki hamun kepada kerajaan.
Debat yang dianjur RTM1 jam 9.00 malam tadi menampilkan Ketua Pemuda PAS, Salahuddin Ayub; Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Hal Ehwal Pengguna (KPDNHEP), Dato' Shahrir Samad selain dua wakil media, Hanafiah Man dan Syed Munawar.
Antara isu yang diperkatakan melalui SMS tersebut ialah bagaimana kerajaan dilihat tergesa-gesa dalam menaikkan harga minyak yang sekaligus akan mengakibatkan kenaikan harga barangan keperluan.
Ada juga pengirin SMS yang menyatakan bahawa tindakan kerajaan ini hanya akan mengakibatkan rakyat terus berada dalam kemiskinan.
Selain itu ramai pengirim SMS yang menyatakan menteri-menteri hanya pandai bercakap mengenai rasional kenaikan harga minyak dengan pelbagai alasan.
Namun pengirin SMS juga berpandangan keperitan akibat kesan kenaikan harga minyak tidak dirasai para menteri kerana gaji, elaun dan 'claim' minyak yang dinikmati menteri tidak memungkinkan mereka menghadapi kemelut kenaikan harga minyak.
Ramai juga pengirim SMS dari Sarawak yang mempertikai tindakan kerajaan menaikkan harga minyak yang menyebabkan harga barangan di Sarawak kini melambung tinggi.
Ada juga pengirim SMS yang mendedahkan beberapa fakta mengenai perbandingan harga minyak antara negara pengeluar minyak di dunia dengan Malaysia yang mana Malaysia menawarkan harga minyak jauh lebih mahal.
Antara yang disebutkan ialah harga minyak di Venezuela (16 sen) dan Turkmenistan (25 sen) yang mana antara negara pengeluar minyak yang menawarkan harga rendah sedangkan nilai simpanan negara tersebut kurang berbanding Malaysia.
Namun dalam rancak pengirim SMS mengecam tindakan kerajaan menaikkan harag minyak, beberapa pengirim SMS juga menghantar kiriman ayat menyokong langkah kerajaan.
Antaranya pengirim mencadangkan agar rakyat Malaysia menggunakan basikal untuk bergerak, namun sebaik sahaja SMS tersebut terpapar dalam skrin televisyen rakan penulis yang turut serta bersama penulis menonton debat tersebut menyatakan rasa meluatnya dengan mesej tersebut.
Beliau berkata, rasionalkah jika seseorang yang kini menaiki kereta ke tempat kerja yang jaraknya lebih 50 kilometer menaiki basikal.
Kata rakan penulis, ini bukannya cadangan bernas menyelesaikan masalah rakyat, tetapi ianya mahu menjadikan rakyat Malaysia 'lembu' yang terus-menerus akan diperbodohkan kerajaan dengan alasan mengarut. - mks. _
No comments:
Post a Comment